<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &amp;#8220;debating&amp;#8221;</title>
	<link>http://www.scyellowdogs.com/2007/04/26/debating/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon,  8 Sep 2008 08:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: NotANative</title>
		<link>http://www.scyellowdogs.com/2007/04/26/debating/#comment-31</link>
		<author>NotANative</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scyellowdogs.com/2007/04/26/debating/#comment-31</guid>
					<description>For one reason, they set rules that really prohibit debate.  They aren't allowed to speak or question each other (not necessarily a bad thing) or really challenge much of what each other says.  Also, it's the first time out together and it's clear the gloves are still on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For one reason, they set rules that really prohibit debate.  They aren&#8217;t allowed to speak or question each other (not necessarily a bad thing) or really challenge much of what each other says.  Also, it&#8217;s the first time out together and it&#8217;s clear the gloves are still on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Court</title>
		<link>http://www.scyellowdogs.com/2007/04/26/debating/#comment-33</link>
		<author>Court</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scyellowdogs.com/2007/04/26/debating/#comment-33</guid>
					<description>This is a bit inane, but another thing I am noticing tonight is a lot less eye-contact with the camera. For the most part, they are all answering the moderators, not addressing the camera. Not sure if that's significant, but I think that everything is so calculated, like what they wear, the hand gestures.... I tend to think that it is calculated not to look at the camera in this debate. Maybe they save that for the debates between the nominees....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a bit inane, but another thing I am noticing tonight is a lot less eye-contact with the camera. For the most part, they are all answering the moderators, not addressing the camera. Not sure if that&#8217;s significant, but I think that everything is so calculated, like what they wear, the hand gestures&#8230;. I tend to think that it is calculated not to look at the camera in this debate. Maybe they save that for the debates between the nominees&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pale Green Pants</title>
		<link>http://www.scyellowdogs.com/2007/04/26/debating/#comment-34</link>
		<author>Pale Green Pants</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scyellowdogs.com/2007/04/26/debating/#comment-34</guid>
					<description>There's so many of them on the stage, it would turn into a brawl if it wasn't controlled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s so many of them on the stage, it would turn into a brawl if it wasn&#8217;t controlled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parker</title>
		<link>http://www.scyellowdogs.com/2007/04/26/debating/#comment-39</link>
		<author>Parker</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scyellowdogs.com/2007/04/26/debating/#comment-39</guid>
					<description>So the debate is leaving the Dems and moving to a debate with Guliani?  Right on, Hillary, for your response to Mayor Guliani's statement that US citizens are more secure with a Republican than a Democratic president.  I say balogna!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the debate is leaving the Dems and moving to a debate with Guliani?  Right on, Hillary, for your response to Mayor Guliani&#8217;s statement that US citizens are more secure with a Republican than a Democratic president.  I say balogna!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NotANative</title>
		<link>http://www.scyellowdogs.com/2007/04/26/debating/#comment-40</link>
		<author>NotANative</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scyellowdogs.com/2007/04/26/debating/#comment-40</guid>
					<description>Chris Dodd was willing to make a firm statement:  I believe civil unions are appropriate and proper.  Nothing wishy washy there!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Dodd was willing to make a firm statement:  I believe civil unions are appropriate and proper.  Nothing wishy washy there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
